Example for first order logic

Example1:

For a person p, let w(p), A(p,y), L(p) and J(p) denote that p is a woman, p admires y, p is a lawyer and p is a judge respectively. Which of the following is the correct translation in first order logic of the sentence: "All woman who are lawyers admire some judge"?

A) ∀x:[(w(x)ΛL(x))⇒(∃y:(J(y)Λw(y)ΛA(x,y)))]

B) ∀x:[(w(x)⇒L(x))⇒(∃y:(J(y)ΛA(x,y)))]

C) ∀x∀y:[(w(x)ΛL(x))⇒(J(y)ΛA(x,y))]

D) ∃y∀x:[(w(x)ΛL(x))⇒(J(y)ΛA(x,y))]

E) ∀x:[(w(x)ΛL(x))⇒(∃y:(J(y)ΛA(x,y)))]

 

 

Solution:

 

Just translating to English:

 

A) Every women who is a lawyer admires some women judge.

B) If a person being women implies she is a lawyer then she admires some judge. OR If a person is not women or is a lawyer he/she admires some judge.

C) Every women who is a lawyer admires every judge.

D) There is some judge who is admired by every women lawyer.

E) Every women lawyer admire some judge. 

 

So, option (E) is the answer. 

 

Example 2:

Which of the following is NOT necessarily true? { Notation: The symbol ''¬''notes negation; P(x,y) means that for given xx and yy, the property P(x,y) is true }.

A) (∀x∀yP(x,y))⇒(∀y∀xP(x,y))

B) (∀x∃y¬P(x,y))⇒¬(∃x∀yP(x,y))

C) (∃x∃yP(x,y))⇒(∃y∃xP(x,y))

D) (∃x∀yP(x,y))⇒(∀y∃xP(x,y))

E) (∀x∃yP(x,y))⇒(∃y∀xP(x,y))

 

 

Solution:

 

Option E is not necessarily true.

 

 

Example 3:

 

Consider the first-order logic sentence F:∀x(∃yR(x,y)). Assuming non-empty logical domains, which of the sentences below are implied by FF?

∃y(∃xR(x,y))

∃y(∀xR(x,y))

∀y(∃xR(x,y))

¬∃x(∀y¬R(x,y))

A) IV only

B) I and IV only

C) II only

D) II and III only

 

Solution:

option B is true

 

1st Method: F:∀x(∃yR(x,y))

Take option 4: ¬∃x(∀y¬R(x,y))

≡∀x(∃yR(x,y)) ((Since we know that ¬∀x≡∃x And  ¬∃x=∀x)

 

 

Example 4:

 

Which one of the following well-formed formulae in predicate calculus is NOT valid ?

A) (∀xp(x)⟹∀xq(x))⟹(∃x¬p(x)∨∀xq(x))

B) (∃xp(x)∨∃xq(x))⟹∃x(p(x)∨q(x))

C) ∃x(p(x)∧q(x))⟹(∃xp(x)∧∃xq(x))

D) ∀x(p(x)∨q(x))⟹(∀xp(x)∨∀xq(x))

 

Solution:

 

Here, (D) is not valid 

Let me prove by an example 

What (D) is saying here is: 

For all x ( x is even no or x is odd no ) ⟹ For all x( x is even no ) or For all x ( x is odd no) 

OR 

If every x is either even or odd, then every x must be even or every x must be odd. 

If our domain is the set of natural numbers LHS is true but RHS is false as not all natural numbers are even or odd. 
 

0Comment