16 Dec 2017 - 10:17pm

i is getting incremented in the loop.
So it will check First Option:1<3, 2<3 and 3<3 (Total 3 Checking)

more less
16 Dec 2017 - 2:03pm

3 times.

more less
19 Nov 2017 - 12:44am

Digital Logic:
1 day, Gates and Minimization.
1 day, Number System
1 day, Combinational Circuits
1 day, Sequential Circuits
So you can cover Digital in 4+1days. (It's very easy so do this 1st)

Discrete Maths:
2 days proposition logic + First order logic
(You can skip other parts and cover them later)

CN:

1st cover IP addresing part. (Most important)
Cover reamining parts as time permits.

P.S - It's my personal suggestions. You can make your own schedule better.

more less
29 Oct 2017 - 2:00pm

We are working for ECE but till now only CSE contents are published.

more less
26 Oct 2017 - 9:31pm
I will highly suggest you to do not waste time specially in pre increment and post increment type questions. We all know these things are system dependent .
more less
25 Oct 2017 - 7:30pm

@setgate
After 1 you can not accpet 0. (You will go to C, which is a dead state)

more less
25 Oct 2017 - 6:48pm

0*1*

more less
4 Oct 2017 - 11:50pm

Suppose you have attributes 10 attributes in a relation R as below

R(A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J )

Now you start finding the candidate key.
Candidate key:- The mininal set of attribute which can uniquely determine all the other attributes.(Note - NOT Minimum set).

You started by taking one attribute.

Suppose B can determine all the other (9) attributes then B is our candidate fine. (It's minimal)

Now, you know that any superset of B will also determine all the other attributes[ Consider AB, It will determine all the attributes because of B.
Now it can not be the candidate key because it's minimal version that it B, is already a candidate key ]. So now we can check taking 2 attributes at a time [example, CD , AD, IJ,....](but not BD, BA...).

You found that { GH, IJ } both the pair can determine all the other attributes. So both GH and IJ will also be our candidate keys. {Note- these are minimal version of itself because you can not remove I or H}.

And so on.

more less
29 Aug 2017 - 7:17pm

How will it be negation of the given statement?

more less
29 Aug 2017 - 5:17pm

"None of my friends are perfect."
negation of above statement will be "atleast one of my friend  is perfect."

more less